读书月福利
欢迎光临中图网 请 | 注册
> >
《都柏林人》的全景式社会思维

《都柏林人》的全景式社会思维

作者:张之俊
出版社:清华大学出版社出版时间:2021-11-01
开本: 其他 页数: 316
本类榜单:教材销量榜
中 图 价:¥84.5(7.1折) 定价  ¥119.0 登录后可看到会员价
加入购物车 收藏
运费6元,满69元免运费
?快递不能达地区使用邮政小包,运费14元起
云南、广西、海南、新疆、青海、西藏六省,部分地区快递不可达
本类五星书更多>

《都柏林人》的全景式社会思维 版权信息

  • ISBN:9787302591139
  • 条形码:9787302591139 ; 978-7-302-59113-9
  • 装帧:70g轻型纸
  • 册数:暂无
  • 重量:暂无
  • 所属分类:>

《都柏林人》的全景式社会思维 本书特色

本书首先探讨了开篇《姊妹们》,认为其显露出小说集的社会思维状况;确立了显性与隐性社会思维;*后分析了末篇《死者》,指出其为小说集的社会思维起到了收尾作用。本书适合对语言、文学与认知界面研究感兴趣的研究生与科研人员阅读,也适合热衷于《都柏林人》的读者阅读。

《都柏林人》的全景式社会思维 内容简介

本书运用认知叙事学领域中的社会思维理论,探讨《都柏林人》小说集中的人物思维互动。本书首先探讨了开篇《姊妹们》,认为其显露出小说集的社会思维状况;其次,本书确立了显性与隐性社会思维;很后分析了末篇《死者》,指出其为小说集的社会思维起到了收尾作用。本书聚焦思维互动,通过文本细致分析,充分展现了都柏林人群体瘫痪精神,深入挖掘了瘫痪这一主题的根源,展现了全景式社会思维。 本书适合对语言、文学与认知界面研究感兴趣的研究生与科研人员阅读,也适合热 衷于《都柏林人》的读者阅读。

《都柏林人》的全景式社会思维 目录

Chapter 1 Introduction

Chapter 2 Previous Research on Dubliners and
Fictional Social Minds
2.1 General Criticisms on Dubliners
2.1.1 The Early Period
2.1.2 The Transitional Period
2.1.3 The Later Period
2.2 Research on Minds in Dubliners
2.2.1 The Textual Approach
2.2.2 The Contextual Approach
2.3 Narratological Approaches to Fictional Minds
2.3.1 The Traditional Narratological Approach
2.3.2 The Cognitive Narratological Approach
2.4 Research on Social Minds in Fictions

Chapter 3 Social Mind Theory and Analytical Framework
3.1 The Social Nature of Mind
3.2 The Social Mind Theory
3.2.1 Palmer's Response to Classical Methodologies
3.2.2 The Centrality of Mind
3.2.3 The Social Mind in Action
3.3 Introducing the Social Mind Theory into Dubliners
3.3.1 Applicability of the Social Mind Theory in Dubliners
3.3.2 Improvement on the Social Mind Theory for Dubliners
3.4 An Analytical Framework

Chapter 4 The Social Minds in "The Sisters": An Exposure
4.1 The Opening: The Boy's Publicly Engaged Mind
4.2 The Boy's Relationship with the Secular Adults
4.2.1 Unreadability of the Male Adults’ Mind
4.2.2 The Boy's Dramaturgical Action
4.2.3 Unreadability of the Female Adults’ Mind
4.2.4 The Boy's "Disappearance
4.2.5 Inescapability from the Secular World
4.3 The Boy's Relationship with Father Flynn
4.3.1 Attributional Difficulty
4.3.2 Inescapability from the Religious World
4.4 Interpretative Uncertainty
4.5 Summary

Chapter 5 The Overt Social Minds
5.1 Tacit Complicity in "The Boarding House
5.1.1 Communal Thought on Mrs. Mooney, Jack and Polly
5.1.2 Intermental Thought: Tacit Complicity between Mother
and Daughter
5.1.3 Ideology: Tacit Co mplicity a mong Ideological Forces
5.2 Open Complicity in "Grace
5.2.1 Foregrounded Communal Perception and Thought
5.2.2 Intermental Thought: Open Complicity
5.2.3 Ideology: Open Complicity between the Church
and the Mammon
5.3 Political Anosognosia in "Ivy Day in the Committee Room
5.3.1 The Opening: "Allegory of the Cave
5.3.2 Hynes' Debut: Failed Enlightenment
5.3.3 No Alcohol Served: Unmasking the Political Anosognosia
5.3.4 Alcohol Served: Fortifying the Political Anosognosia
5.4 Summary

Chapter 6 The Covert Social Minds
6.1 Group Servility
6.1.1 Group Servility to the Colonialism
6.1.2 Group Servility to the Church
6.1.3 Females’ Group Servility to the Patriarchy
6.2 Group Self-Unknowing
6.2.1 Group Self-Deception
6.2.2 Group Anosognosia
6.3 Group Isolation
6.3.1 Individuals against Crowds
6.3.2 Group Self-Division
6.4 Summary

Chapter 7 The Social Minds in "The Dead": A Closure
7.1 The Dublin Bourgeois Communal Thought
7.1.1 Communal Thought: Bourgeois Pretentiousness
7.1.2 Communal Thought: Bourgeois Hypocrisy
7.2 Gabriel's Encounters with Three Females
7.2.1 Gabriel's Encounter with Lily
7.2.2 Gabriel's Encounter with Miss Ivors
7.2.3 Gabriel's Encounter with Gretta
7.3 The Ending: Gabriel's Epiphany
7.4 Summary

Chapter 8 Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix A Synopses of the Fifteen Stories in Dubliners
Appendix B Composition Time of the Dubliners Stories

展开全部

《都柏林人》的全景式社会思维 节选

  In his review of traditional narratology,Palmer finds out that the traditional narratological approach to fictional minds (Bal,1997; Chatman,1978; Cohn,1978; Fludernik,1993; Lodge,2002) takes the internalist perspective to capture only part of the fictional minds because of its undue emphasis on the inner,introspective,private,solitary,and individual mind (2010: 39). As a result,this internalist perspective is preoccupied with such concepts as direct thought,free indirect thought,stream of consaousness,and interior monologue,etc. that Palmer dubs the "speech category approach" (see Section 2.3.1,Chapter 2). Palmer points out that since the speech category approach "is concerned primarily with part of the mind known as inner speech,the highly verbalized flow of self-conscious thought" (2004: 53),it neglects the other parts of the mind such as feelings,desires,beliefs,intentions,dispositions and emotions,and consequently,fails to give a full account of the social aspects of the mental processes. In his own remarks,"In my view,the position is very simple: sometimes thought is highly verbalized and can accurately be described as inner speech; sometimes it is not and so cannot"(65) Of the three modes of thought presentation: direct thought,thought report and free indirect thought,Palmer analyzes their functions of presenting the areas of the mind. He ranks them according to their degrees of presenting mind: thought report apt for all areas of the mind,including inner speech,free indirect thought apt for inner speech and some other areas of the mind,and direct thought apt only for inner speech (56). Based on this discovery,Palmer points out that the speech category approach privileges the mimetic categories of direct thought and free indirect thought,conveying individual and private minds over the diegetic category of thought report which renders "such states of mind as emotions,sensations,dispositions,beliefs,attitudes,intentions,motives,and reason for action" (13). He argues that thought report is the versatile technique in that it can summarize inner speech and present it as mental action (56). Therefore,Palmer puts the mode of thought report "at the center of the presentations by narrators to readers of the contents of fictionalminds in their social and physical contexts" (76). He further suggests that as against the speech category approach,his new approach is "toward narrators' presentations of the whole mind that focuses on both states of mind and inner speech and that acknowledges the indispensable and pivotal role of thought report in linking individual mental functioning to its social context" (ibid.).The narrator,treated as intrusive or distorting in the speech category approach,is taken to assume a "linking function" (ibid.) by situating the characters' minds within their physical and soaal context. Thus,Palmer "rehabilitated thoughtreport […] as a sophisticated and flexible technique for the representation of fictional consciousness" (Keen,2011: 358) because it "is ideally suited to informative presentations of the purposive and directive nature of thought as well as its social nature" (Palmer,2004: 76),and "is the norm because the linking function is such a vital contribution to what can plausibly be described as the purpose of the novel: the exploration of the relationship between indMduals and the soaeties within which they live" (78).In addition to the speech category approach,story analysis,the concept of focalization,and characterization theory as the other classical methodologies "do not add up to a complete and coherent study of all aspects of the minds of characters in novels" (Palmer,2010: 8),either.Palmer subsumes such branch of narrative theory by structuralists as narrative grammar,narrative structures,the analysis of story,the functional classification of action sequences under the rubric of "story analysis" (2004:28),in which structuralist theorists define characters as functions (Propp,1968),or as actants (Bremond,1973; Greimas,1983; Todorov,1977). Palmer points out that story analysis based on characters as actants of fixed functions is "at a very high level of abstraction" (2004: 29). Herman also questions the structuralist narratologists' view of characters as "regularly recurring,typifiable 'participants' in the syntagmatic unfolding of the narrated action" (1999: 233-234). Thus,if a character is regarded as someone who can think,feel,believe,desire,including all sorts of mental activities,the structuralist narratologists'view precludes any mental activity a character can be entitled to. In Palmer's words,"if the ways in which characters are constructed by readers are to be fully understood,they have to be regarded as fictional beings that are related to world view and time-space in a fuller and more holistic manner than story analysis envisages" (2004: 30). In addition,Palmer also pinpoints the limited use of the concept of action by story analysis. He argues that "The analysis of narrative structures is clearly dependent on a good deal of indirect inference about fictional minds through examinations of the function and significance of the physical actions caused by those minds" (ibid.). In this sense,the scope of study on fictional minds is extended from direct reference to mental states toactions caused by those mental states. Therefore,the study on fictional minds is concerned with the characters' fictional minds. In turn,the concept of event in story analysis is targeted by Palmer,who strongly argues that "Events only have significance if they are experienced by actors" (ibid.). ……

《都柏林人》的全景式社会思维 作者简介

张之俊,清华大学外国语言文学博士,现为中国地质大学(北京)外国语学院教师,主要研究领域为认知叙事学与乔伊斯作品研究,发表本领域CSSCI来源期刊研究论文,主持与参与各级项目十余项。两次获得国家留学基金委资助分别在美国和英国高校做访问学者。曾获得2010年北京市高等教育学会研究生英语教学研究分会第二届青年教师基本功比赛特等奖,2018年 第九届“外教社杯”全国高校外语教学大赛(英语类专业组)北京赛区英语专业组一等奖。

商品评论(0条)
暂无评论……
书友推荐
编辑推荐
返回顶部
中图网
在线客服